A Pushover analysis approach considering structural and loading uncertainties for seismic performance assessment

Authors

  • Mohamed Badaoui
  • Abdallah Yacine Rahmani
  • Nouredine Bourahla
  • Sarra Hachi
  • Mohamed Benyagoub

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54021/seesv5n1-036

Keywords:

Pushover, capacity curve, response spectrum, structural uncertainty, seismic design, Monte Carlo simulation, target displacement, damage level

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach for evaluating the seismic performance of buildings. By considering the uncertainties in material and geometrical properties of the structural elements as well as those related to the seismic loading, this method aims to delimit the performance zone of the structure rather than focusing on a single performance point commonly used in pushover analysis. This zone makes it possible to identify the probable levels of performance of the building linked to uncertainties and to indicate the most severe level of damage. Reasoning by performance points leads to an answer that gives a single state of damage. The performance zone is defined by capacity curves and response spectrum representing the mean values plus and minus standard deviation obtained by Monte Carlo simulations. These simulations consider the stiffnesses of the structural elements, the natural periods, and the damping ratio of the response spectrum as random variables. The application of the procedure to a case of a building made it possible to identify the upper limit of damage corresponding to the most unfavourable scenario of uncertainties, as well as the situation of the response value of the studied structure in the performance zone, indicating a less critical level of damage (minor damage) to the building. The calculation of the performance point revealed a level of damage oscillating between Immediate Occupancy (IO) and Life Safety (LS). Considering the uncertainties in the material and geometric properties of the structural elements as well as those linked to the response spectrum, the probable extreme damage state is between the LS and CP levels (severe damage).

References

ANTONIOU, S.; PINHO, R. Development and Verification of a Displacement-Based Adaptive Pushover Procedure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, v. 8, n. 5, p. 643–661, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350504

ATC-40. Seismic Evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology council, California, v. 1 and 2, p. 1996, 1996.

BENAHMED, B.; HAMMOUTENE, M.; CARDONE, D. Effects of damping uncertainties on damping reduction factors. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, v. 61, n. 2, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3311/ppci.9665

BRACCI, J. M.; KUNNATH, S. K.; REINHORN, A. M. Seismic Performance and Retrofit Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)

BS EN 1998-1. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1 : General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. [s.l: s.n.]. v. 1

CGS. Seismic Code for Building Design and Construction. RPA99v2003 ed. Algiers, Algeria: National Earthquake Engineering Research centre, 2003.

CHOPRA, A. K.; GOEL, R. K. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, v. 33, n. 8, p. 903–927, 10 jul. 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380

DE LA LLERA, J. C.; CHOPRA, A. K. Accidental torsion in buildings due to stiffness uncertainty. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, v. 23, n. 2, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230202

ELNASHAI, A. S. . Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, v. 12, n. 1, p. 51–69, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051

FAJFAR, P.; GAŠPERŠIČ, P. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 25, n. 1, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::aid-eqe534>3.0.co;2-v

FEMA. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington (DC): [s.n.].

GUPTA, B.; KUNNATH, S. K. Adaptive Spectra-Based Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117, v. 16, n. 2, p. 367–391, 1 maio 2000.

KALKAN, E.; KUNNATH, S. K. Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Predicting Seismic Response of Vertically Irregular Structural Systems. … US National Conference on Earthquake …, 2006.

KUNNATH, S. K.; KALKAN, E. Evaluation of Seismic Deformation Demands Using Non-Linear Procedures in Multistory Steel and Concrete Moment Frames. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, v. 41 No. 1, n. 445, p. 159–181, 2004.

PANANDIKAR HEDE, N.; NARAYAN, K. S. B. Sensitivity of Pushover Curve to Material and Geometric Modelling-An Analytical Investigation. Structures, v. 2, p. 91–97, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.02.004

RAHMANI, A. Y. et al. Adaptive upper-bound pushover analysis for high-rise moment steel frames. Structures, v. 20, p. 912–923, 1 ago. 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.07.006

RAHMANI, A. Y. et al. Extension of the improved upper-bound pushover analysis for seismic assessment of steel moment resisting frames with setbacks. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, v. 20, n. 13, p. 7609–7640, 1 out. 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1197067/v1

YU, X. et al. Global probabilistic seismic capacity analysis of structures through stochastic pushover analysis. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Anais...Beiging, China.: 2008.

Published

2024-03-21

How to Cite

Badaoui, M., Rahmani , A. Y., Bourahla, N., Hachi, S., & Benyagoub, M. (2024). A Pushover analysis approach considering structural and loading uncertainties for seismic performance assessment. STUDIES IN ENGINEERING AND EXACT SCIENCES, 5(1), 634–648. https://doi.org/10.54021/seesv5n1-036